Skip to content

Results:

71 - 80 of 176

Documents

December 17, 1987

Department of State Telegram to US Embassy Islamabad, 'Pervez Case Verdict'

After hearing tape-recorded conversations and seeing Pervez’s diary entries and the Pervez-Carpenter correspondence, on 17 December 1987, the jury found him guilty on 5 out of 8 counts, including conspiracy, attempted export of beryllium without the required license, and submitting false end-use statements about the maraging steel. Inam Ul-Haq was also found guilty of conspiracy and false statements.

December 14, 1987

Department of State, Memorandum from Jonathan Schwartz to Ms. Verville [et al.], 'Pervez Trial Status'

After hearing tape-recorded conversations and seeing Pervez’s diary entries and the Pervez-Carpenter correspondence, on 17 December 1987, the jury found him guilty on 5 out of 8 counts, including conspiracy, attempted export of beryllium without the required license, and submitting false end-use statements about the maraging steel. Inam Ul-Haq was also found guilty of conspiracy and false statements.

December 23, 1987

Department of State, Memorandum from Jonathan Schwartz to Ms. Verville [et al.], 'Pervez Trial Status'

After hearing tape-recorded conversations and seeing Pervez’s diary entries and the Pervez-Carpenter correspondence, on 17 December 1987, the jury found him guilty on 5 out of 8 counts, including conspiracy, attempted export of beryllium without the required license, and submitting false end-use statements about the maraging steel. Inam Ul-Haq was also found guilty of conspiracy and false statements.

November 21, 1987

Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, Memorandum from Kenneth Adelman for the President, 'Certification on Pakistan'

Secretary Shultz had recommended that Washington “now certify” that Pakistan “does not possess a nuclear device” (as required by the Pressler amendment).

November 1987

United States v. Arshad Pervez, Criminal Number 87-00283, Exhibits 38-86 through 52

The exhibits included Pervez’s notebooks with such incriminating language as “atom” and “military.”

November 1987

United States v. Arshad Pervez, Criminal Number 87-00283, Exhibits 38-38 through 38-85

The exhibits included Pervez’s notebooks with such incriminating language as “atom” and “military.”

November 1987

United States v. Arshad Pervez, Criminal Number 87-00283, Exhibits 24 through 38-37

The exhibits included Pervez’s notebooks with such incriminating language as “atom” and “military.” Moreover, “my expert is procurement manager for nuclear plant.” A letter from Ul-Haq to Pervez from early 1987 demonstrated that this was more than a business venture: “personal interests must not be allowed to overtake national interests.”

November 1987

United States v. Arshad Pervez, Criminal Number 87-00283, Exhibit List

The exhibits included Pervez’s notebooks with such incriminating language as “atom” and “military.”

November 4, 1987

Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, Memorandum from Kenneth Adelman to Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs, 'A Strategy on Pakistan'

Adelman advised Armacost to “increase pressure on Pakistan to try to get them to stop enrichment above five percent and to stop illegal procurement activities in the United States.”

September 5, 1987

State Department Telegram 278631 to US Embassy Ottawa, 'Access to Canadian Documents In Pervez Case'

The Canadian government cooperated with the US Justice Department in the Pervez case by seizing documents at his and making them available to federal prosecutors. The State Department wanted permission to review the documents “on the premises of the U.S. law enforcement authorities.”

Pagination