Search | Wilson Center Digital Archive

Switch to Visualization

National Archives of India Clear All

Related Resources

The Taj Mahal Shrine in Agra, India.

South Asia

India

Indian Nuclear History

Aerial view of National Mall

North America

United States

Soviet soldier taking a photograph of another soldier in Red Square, Moscow, 1959

Eastern Europe

Soviet Union

Portrait of Mao Zedong on Tiananmen Gate in Beijing, China, 1972.

East Asia

China

Placeholder image for when a places image is not available

South America

Chile

Placeholder image for when a portrait image is not available

Hungary. Embassy (India)

-

Nuclear Proliferation

Placeholder image for when a places image is not available

North America

Mexico

Placeholder image for when a portrait image is not available

United States. Department of State

-

Soviet Foreign Policy

Placeholder image for when a portrait image is not available

Allende Gossens, Salvador

1908- 1973

Placeholder image for when a portrait image is not available

United States. Embassy (India)

-

Chinese Nuclear History

China and South Asia

Placeholder image for when a portrait image is not available

Bhandari, P. L.

-

Indira Gandhi, 1982

Gandhi, Indira

1917- 1984

Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT)

Results:

101 - 110 of 150

Display:

Sort By:

Documents

1964	Message from P. K. Patnaik, Deputy Secretary, 'Inter-Parliamentary Conference held in Belgrade (Yugoslavia) in September, 1963, Resolutions' The last conference of the Inter-Parliamentary Union adopted a resolution regarding the creation of denuclearized and limited armaments zone
1964	Note on the Views of the Dutch Government on Disarmament The Dutch government supports a general and complete disarmament agreement under international control, but such agreement should not disturb the balance of power.
March 3, 1956	Excerpt from Papers Prepared by the Historical Division on Antarctica Antarctica is a strategic location with abundant natural resources and thirty countries are involved in research there.
August 18, 1951	Letter from F.C. How to Roger Makins F.C. How of the Ministry of Supply replies to Roger Makins of the Foreign Office regarding negotiations for British nuclear cooperation with India.
June 5, 1951	Secret Letter from Roger Makins to Michael W. Perrin Roger Makins of the British Foreign Office informs Michael Perrin, Deputy Controller for Atomic Energy, about negotiations between India and the United States and India and France for nuclear cooperation.
January 25, 1952	Letter from John D. Cockcroft to Homi J. Bhabha John D. Cockcroft, head of the British Atomic Energy Research Establishment, writes to Homi J. Bhabha, Chairman of the Indian Atomic Energy Commission, informing him that the British will not be assisting India with its beryllium experiements since India has already made agreements with the French Atomic Energy project.
October 30, 1951	Letter from UK Embassy in Paris to London on Franco-Indian agreement British Ambassador Oliver Harvey reports a conversation with the Director of the French Atomic Energy Commission Jules Guéron on the details of Franco-Indian nuclear cooperation.
April 21, 1954	Letter from Roger Makins to Lewis L. Strauss Roger Makins of the British Foreign Office writes to Lewis Strauss of the American Atomic Energy Commission regarding a change in policy to allow Britain to share nuclear information with members of the British Commonwealth.
January 28, 1970	Telegram from Indian Embassy in China on Sino-Soviet Border Negotiations The India embassy in Beijing reports on recent developments in the Sino-Soviet border negotiations. The lead Soviet negotiator, Kuznetsov, had become increasingly open about the progress of the ongoing talks due to political maneuvering by China. The negotiator claimed that "the talks have not progressed because the Chinese have adopted a [sic] uncompromising attitude on reaching agreement on maintenance of [the] status quo."
April 4, 1973	Bombay consulate cable 705 to Department of State, 'India’s Nuclear Position' The possibility that India had made a decision to test surfaced in a message from the U.S. consulate in Bombay (Mumbai) signed off by Consul David M. Bane. The latter reported that Oak Ridge Laboratory scientist John J. Pinajian, then serving as the Atomic Energy Commission’s scientific representative in India, had pointed out several “indications”—-notably his lack of access to key individuals and facilities in India’s atomic establishment--suggesting that India “may well have decided” to test a nuclear device. While stating that Pinajian’s evaluation was “subjective and impressionistic,” Consul Bane agreed that the atomic energy establishment did not want this American poking around because he might find out too much. Bane further observed that a nuclear test “in the not too distant future” could meet India’s political goals and help attain “greater recognition major power status.”