1893-1976
Eastern Europe
(372) documents
North America
Western Europe
1909- 1989
-
1925-
1906- 1982
October 13, 1965
INR looked closely at Soviet positions on an NPT arguing that the Soviets appeared to “attach a higher priority in using the nondissemination issue as a means of attacking possible NATO nuclear arrangements than in concluding an agreement.”
September 29, 1965
October 5, 1967
This memorandum to Commissioner Martino from Ambassador Schaetzel accepts the Soviet Draft Article III as he believes it will permit non-nuclear Euratom countries to negotiate collectively with the IAEA and permit a satisfactory verification concept.
January 18, 1968
This presentation, given by Felix Oboussier, discusses the potential impacts the NPT may have on the Euratom Treaty. He concludes that a definitive opinion on the whether or not the requirements and objections of non-nuclear member states have been fully taken into account seems premature.
January 1968
This article by Jan Gijssels discusses the legal implications of Euratom and the proposed Non-Proliferation Treaty.
February 7, 1967
This note to the Council of Ministers details the jurisdiction and consequences stemming from the American request that an Article III be included into the NPT.
November 13, 1967
Checklist of topics covered in discussions between the United States and the Soviet Union on Article III of the Nonproliferation Treaty.
March 29, 1967
This project served as a response to questions asked by the Committee of Permanent Representatives to the Council. It discusses the compatibility of the NPT project and the Euratom Treaty as well as modifications.
Euratom Commission Draft proposed by the US Government to the USSR. Contains six articles detailing the obligations and responsibilities of nuclear weapons and non-nuclear weapons states.
January 20, 1965
(Excerpts) Minutes of discussions of the Warsaw Pact Political Consultative Committee concerning non-proliferation. The Romanian delegation argues against a joint declaration of the Warsaw Pact on non-proliferation for fear that it might be used against China. The other delegations argue that a joint declaration is necessary in order to prevent the creation of the Multilaterall Nuclear Force proposed by NATO.